VIN vs YEAR

Allan Woodcock · Nov 11, 2001

The article in the latest Amphicar Newsletter concerning VIN vs YEAR did
not seem logical to me. I am at Gordon Imports at least once a week so
Hugh gave me his understanding on this subject. The first thing he said
was that any variation to the norm could exist because the 9 digit
numbers were stamped on the tags in the USA by the distributor. So, if
a car did not sell one year it could conceivably be stamped with the
next year and sold. The cars before 1966 had the 6 digit serial number.
101XXX was for ?64 and older. 102XXX was not produced according to Hugh
yet that is the number on Paul Rasmussens car (something to be worked
out later ? how many cars have a 2 in the 3rd position?). 103XXX was for
?65.
Next come the nine digit cars. The number 562 was added after the
second number in the original German numbering. Thus all cars after
1965 have a 562 in the VIN XX562XXXX. A 1 after the 562 was for 1966.
A 2 or a 3 after 562 was for 1967.
If we use the system mentioned in the newsletter then all nine digit
cars would have been built in 1962 and a car with a 103XXX German vin
number would have been built in 1963 and not 1965. Since my car (
106521991) has a 1 after the 652 I plan to show the year as 1966 since
the space for year manufactured is blank on the tag. If you look at
the club roster you will see couple of examples of cars that may be from
a different year than listed. Nils Brock(103092) is listed as a 1966
when I might be a 1965. The same goes with Arnold Hite. Sidney
Armistead (106523027) is listed as a 1977 when it in fact might be a
1967. So, it?s the 3rd digit in the German numbering system and the
6th digit in the 9 digit US numbering system that supposedly hold the
key to the year of manufacture.

Allan Woodcock
Red ?67 soon to be a ?66

John Friese · Nov 12, 2001

Allan,
I have a very late car (black upper doors) that came from Canada. It
has VIN number 106524160. How does this car fit into your numbering
scheme? Wouldn't your numbering system make it a 1969? That
can't be right.

John Friese

--- In amphicar-lovers@y..., Allan Woodcock <awoodc@e...> wrote:
> The article in the latest Amphicar Newsletter concerning VIN vs YEAR
did
> not seem logical to me. I am at Gordon Imports at least once a week
so
> Hugh gave me his understanding on this subject. The first thing he
said
> was that any variation to the norm could exist because the 9 digit
> numbers were stamped on the tags in the USA by the distributor. So,
if
> a car did not sell one year it could conceivably be stamped with the
> next year and sold. The cars before 1966 had the 6 digit serial
number.
> 101XXX was for '64 and older. 102XXX was not produced according to
Hugh
> yet that is the number on Paul Rasmussens car (something to be
worked
> out later ? how many cars have a 2 in the 3rd position?). 103XXX was
for
> '65.
> Next come the nine digit cars. The number 562 was added after the
> second number in the original German numbering. Thus all cars after
> 1965 have a 562 in the VIN XX562XXXX. A 1 after the 562 was for
1966.
> A 2 or a 3 after 562 was for 1967.
> If we use the system mentioned in the newsletter then all nine digit
> cars would have been built in 1962 and a car with a 103XXX German
vin
> number would have been built in 1963 and not 1965. Since my car (
> 106521991) has a 1 after the 652 I plan to show the year as 1966
since
> the space for year manufactured is blank on the tag. If you look
at
> the club roster you will see couple of examples of cars that may be
from
> a different year than listed. Nils Brock(103092) is listed as a
1966
> when I might be a 1965. The same goes with Arnold Hite. Sidney
> Armistead (106523027) is listed as a 1977 when it in fact might be a
> 1967. So, it's the 3rd digit in the German numbering system and
the
> 6th digit in the 9 digit US numbering system that supposedly hold
the
> key to the year of manufacture.
>
> Allan Woodcock
> Red '67 soon to be a `66

Ren? Pohl · Nov 13, 2001

Re: Re: VIN vs YEAR

Yes, in the 9 digit US number it is certainly the 6th digit giving the year
of manufacture. So it is a 1964 in this case. Sorry for the confusion, just
noticed this little mistake of saying 5th digit in the IAOCnews when I
received it! A bit too late- sorry.
Anyway in the 6 digit number it is the 3rd digit telling the year of
production.
Important: Keep in mind that most cars were sold sometimes years later after
production and that NO car was built later than 1965 (except perhaps three
cars built from parts in the 70s by some German Amphifriends).

Ren? Pohl
www.schwimmauto.de

----- Original Message -----
From: John Friese <jfriese@mindspring.com>
To: <amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:04 AM
Subject: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

Allan,
I have a very late car (black upper doors) that came from Canada. It
has VIN number 106524160. How does this car fit into your numbering
scheme? Wouldn't your numbering system make it a 1969? That
can't be right.

John Friese

--- In amphicar-lovers@y..., Allan Woodcock <awoodc@e...> wrote:
> The article in the latest Amphicar Newsletter concerning VIN vs YEAR
did
> not seem logical to me. I am at Gordon Imports at least once a week
so
> Hugh gave me his understanding on this subject. The first thing he
said
> was that any variation to the norm could exist because the 9 digit
> numbers were stamped on the tags in the USA by the distributor. So,
if
> a car did not sell one year it could conceivably be stamped with the
> next year and sold. The cars before 1966 had the 6 digit serial
number.
> 101XXX was for '64 and older. 102XXX was not produced according to
Hugh
> yet that is the number on Paul Rasmussens car (something to be
worked
> out later - how many cars have a 2 in the 3rd position?). 103XXX was
for
> '65.
> Next come the nine digit cars. The number 562 was added after the
> second number in the original German numbering. Thus all cars after
> 1965 have a 562 in the VIN XX562XXXX. A 1 after the 562 was for
1966.
> A 2 or a 3 after 562 was for 1967.
> If we use the system mentioned in the newsletter then all nine digit
> cars would have been built in 1962 and a car with a 103XXX German
vin
> number would have been built in 1963 and not 1965. Since my car (
> 106521991) has a 1 after the 652 I plan to show the year as 1966
since
> the space for year manufactured is blank on the tag. If you look
at
> the club roster you will see couple of examples of cars that may be
from
> a different year than listed. Nils Brock(103092) is listed as a
1966
> when I might be a 1965. The same goes with Arnold Hite. Sidney
> Armistead (106523027) is listed as a 1977 when it in fact might be a
> 1967. So, it's the 3rd digit in the German numbering system and
the
> 6th digit in the 9 digit US numbering system that supposedly hold
the
> key to the year of manufacture.
>
> Allan Woodcock
> Red '67 soon to be a `66

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

John · Nov 13, 2001

--- In amphicar-lovers@y..., Ren? Pohl <amphicar@g...> wrote:
> Yes, in the 9 digit US number it is certainly the 6th digit giving
the year of manufacture. So it is a 1964 in this case.
> Anyway in the 6 digit number it is the 3rd digit telling the year of
> production.
> Important: Keep in mind that most cars were sold sometimes years
later after
> production and that NO car was built later than
1965.

******** I've been reading the posts on the side hoping to learn
something here but only wind up more confused than before. I own two
Amphi's and wonder about the year/vin thing. The first one is 101221
which is titled as a 63. According to the posts here I'll buy that it
was built in 61 if the third digit says so. However the second car I
have is a one owner, driven one season car and parked with 974
original miles. Its vin is 106522387 which the people here say is a
62 according to the 6th digit. This I dont believe - sorry. Am I
wrong? JW *****

John · Nov 13, 2001

--- In amphicar-lovers@y..., "John" <isettajohn@a...> wrote:

> However the second car I have is a one owner, driven one season car
and parked with 974 original miles. Its vin is 106522387 which the
people here say is a 62 according to the 6th digit. This I dont
believe - sorry. Am I wrong? JW
*****
Oh, I forgot to mention that the second car is
titled as a 1967.

Schulz Gary-FGS111 · Nov 14, 2001

RE: Re: VIN vs YEAR

I think there is absolutely no credible evidence that says a VIN 101221 was
built in 1961. By that logic the Amphi corp could only limit their yearly
output to 1000 cars otherwise they would defeat their own numbering scheme. I
still say They just numbered then sequentially. Look at the transmissions, They
are sequential. Also I don't believe the bit about VIN's being stamped at
various times by dealers. I can say without reservation that the numbers on
mine were all stamped at the same time by the same tool!

Gary Schulz

-----Original Message-----
From: John [mailto:isettajohn@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:08 PM
To: amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

--- In amphicar-lovers@y..., Ren? Pohl <amphicar@g...> wrote:
> Yes, in the 9 digit US number it is certainly the 6th digit giving
the year of manufacture. So it is a 1964 in this case.
> Anyway in the 6 digit number it is the 3rd digit telling the year of
> production.
> Important: Keep in mind that most cars were sold sometimes years
later after
> production and that NO car was built later than
1965.

******** I've been reading the posts on the side hoping to learn
something here but only wind up more confused than before. I own two
Amphi's and wonder about the year/vin thing. The first one is 101221
which is titled as a 63. According to the posts here I'll buy that it
was built in 61 if the third digit says so. However the second car I
have is a one owner, driven one season car and parked with 974
original miles. Its vin is 106522387 which the people here say is a
62 according to the 6th digit. This I dont believe - sorry. Am I
wrong? JW *****

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

tommyintpa@aol.com · Nov 14, 2001

Re: Re: VIN vs YEAR

In a message dated 11/14/01 4:39:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, amphicar@gmx.de writes:

<blockquote TYPE="CITE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">That?s a good point!

Okay, if that is true, there should no car above VIN 10...3878 out there.

Because that is the number of produced cars. Hey, anybody out there can beat

the ...3878 at the VINs end?

Ren?

</blockquote>



Hi all, John Friese has # 10 652 4160 and we have #10 652 4216. His car from Canada ours is European. Tommy in Tampa

aheath@us.ibm.com · Nov 14, 2001

> Regarding: Next come the nine digit cars. The number 562
was added after the second number in the original German
numbering. Thus all cars after 1965 have a 562 in the VIN
XX562XXXX. A 1 after the 562 was for 1966. A 2 or a 3 after
562 was for 1967.
-----
Okay, so three of my cars are 9 digit vin's. How does this
fit the theory. They are:
Car #1 10 652 2 293 - a digit 2='67?
Car #2 10 652 2 329 - a digit 2='67?
Car #3 10 652 1 981 - a digit 1='66?
Car #4 is a 6 digit Vin, so I won't even discuss it here.

But Car#1 was registered as a '65, two years before it was
manufactured (or otherwise stamped)? It also has under hull
front shocks, no lips, prop baffles.

Car #2 was also registered in '65, also two years before it
was manufactured? It has lips, through hull shocks, no
baffles.

Car #3 was registered in '67 so it could have been
manufactured in '66. It has lips, through hull shocks, no
baffles. But it's vin # predates the other two, including the
one with the under hull shocks, no lips, etc.

To my knowledge, these cars were not composits restored from a
from a bunch of other cars. All three cars have the "small
bilge" plug.

I'm totally confused on this VIN vs Year issue, but heck, it
doesn't matter in the middle of the lake! Speaking of that,
it's lunch time, no wind, 70 something outside.... What am I
doin' here??? bye....

Al Heath

markamsdill@aol.com · Nov 14, 2001

Re: Re: VIN vs YEAR

<table BGCOLOR="#ffffff">Hello all, Mark from Dexter here. We have a blue 62 # 100093. It must be one of the early ones, We have more fun with this car than any of our other cars . I should have bought one years ago.Everyone have a great holiday season and wish for an early thaw. Mark and Karen Amsdill

tommyintpa@aol.com · Nov 14, 2001

Re: Re: VIN vs YEAR

In a message dated 11/14/01 3:02:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, fgs111@email.mot.com writes:



<blockquote TYPE="CITE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">The date stamped on it absolutely was stamped at the same time as the rest of the information. Same die same strike depth. The VIN # 100927 But the stamped date is 1963.

Gary Schulz

</blockquote>



Hi all, We have 100289, Snappy is a white '64

Same die same strike depth.

Tommy in Tampa

Ren? Pohl · Nov 14, 2001

Re: Re: VIN vs YEAR

Why don?t you believe it? For an Amphicar it is absolutely usual that they
sat out somewhere in a lot for years before they were sold! Mine is VIN
101795 that means it is a 61 model! But first registration was 1967! So it
was already 6 years old when sold from factory! That is not an exception but
the rule! I wonder how you believe in 67 when it is proofed that production
stopped in 65 already.
Anyway your 101221 is a 61 model for sure and your 106522387 a 62 model -
that?s right. What makes you doubt about it? Hey, if this car is that
original as you say, take off the hubcaps and examinate the wheel for
numbers. You should see the date of production on the wheel somewhere.
Unless somebody may have changed them.
Ren?

----- Original Message -----
From: John <isettajohn@aol.com>
To: <amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:08 AM
Subject: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

--- In amphicar-lovers@y..., Ren? Pohl <amphicar@g...> wrote:
> Yes, in the 9 digit US number it is certainly the 6th digit giving
the year of manufacture. So it is a 1964 in this case.
> Anyway in the 6 digit number it is the 3rd digit telling the year of
> production.
> Important: Keep in mind that most cars were sold sometimes years
later after
> production and that NO car was built later than
1965.

******** I've been reading the posts on the side hoping to learn
something here but only wind up more confused than before. I own two
Amphi's and wonder about the year/vin thing. The first one is 101221
which is titled as a 63. According to the posts here I'll buy that it
was built in 61 if the third digit says so. However the second car I
have is a one owner, driven one season car and parked with 974
original miles. Its vin is 106522387 which the people here say is a
62 according to the 6th digit. This I dont believe - sorry. Am I
wrong? JW *****

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Ren? Pohl · Nov 14, 2001

Re: Re: VIN vs YEAR

That?s a good point!
Okay, if that is true, there should no car above VIN 10...3878 out there.
Because that is the number of produced cars. Hey, anybody out there can beat
the ...3878 at the VINs end?
Ren?

----- Original Message -----
From: Schulz Gary-FGS111 <fgs111@email.mot.com>
To: <amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:29 PM
Subject: RE: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

I think there is absolutely no credible evidence that says a VIN 101221 was
built in 1961. By that logic the Amphi corp could only limit their yearly
output to 1000 cars otherwise they would defeat their own numbering scheme.
I still say They just numbered then sequentially. Look at the
transmissions, They are sequential. Also I don't believe the bit about
VIN's being stamped at various times by dealers. I can say without
reservation that the numbers on mine were all stamped at the same time by
the same tool!

Gary Schulz

-----Original Message-----
From: John [mailto:isettajohn@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:08 PM
To: amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

--- In amphicar-lovers@y..., Ren? Pohl <amphicar@g...> wrote:
> Yes, in the 9 digit US number it is certainly the 6th digit giving
the year of manufacture. So it is a 1964 in this case.
> Anyway in the 6 digit number it is the 3rd digit telling the year of
> production.
> Important: Keep in mind that most cars were sold sometimes years
later after
> production and that NO car was built later than
1965.

******** I've been reading the posts on the side hoping to learn
something here but only wind up more confused than before. I own two
Amphi's and wonder about the year/vin thing. The first one is 101221
which is titled as a 63. According to the posts here I'll buy that it
was built in 61 if the third digit says so. However the second car I
have is a one owner, driven one season car and parked with 974
original miles. Its vin is 106522387 which the people here say is a
62 according to the 6th digit. This I dont believe - sorry. Am I
wrong? JW *****

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

tommyintpa@aol.com · Nov 14, 2001

Re: Re: VIN vs YEAR

David Chapman, what is the vin # of your car?

I thought it started with 107......?
Keep smiling, Tommy in Tampa

Schulz Gary-FGS111 · Nov 14, 2001

RE: Re: VIN vs YEAR

If VIN's were not stamped by the manufacturer, how is it that each car has a
unique VIN? What computer data-base existed so that all the various dealers
(dealers with stores that sold sporting goods and dealers that sold cars
only)would be able to generate VIN's that didn't overlap? It is also illegal
(in the states)for any automotive dealer to manipulate the VIN as produced by
the factory (amended maybe but not altered). I also agree with a point that Marc
made in an earlier posting about this theory that one could have ordered black
dash and raised lips as an option? Sounds more like an attempt at the under
funded amphicar corp. trying to minimize glare coming from the dash on later
models, realizing additional federal regulation was on the way....

Gary Schulz

-----Original Message-----
From: Ren? Pohl [mailto:amphicar@gmx.de]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:58 PM
To: amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

That?s a good point!
Okay, if that is true, there should no car above VIN 10...3878 out there.
Because that is the number of produced cars. Hey, anybody out there can beat
the ...3878 at the VINs end?
Ren?

----- Original Message -----
From: Schulz Gary-FGS111 <fgs111@email.mot.com>
To: <amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:29 PM
Subject: RE: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

I think there is absolutely no credible evidence that says a VIN 101221 was
built in 1961. By that logic the Amphi corp could only limit their yearly
output to 1000 cars otherwise they would defeat their own numbering scheme.
I still say They just numbered then sequentially. Look at the
transmissions, They are sequential. Also I don't believe the bit about
VIN's being stamped at various times by dealers. I can say without
reservation that the numbers on mine were all stamped at the same time by
the same tool!

Gary Schulz

-----Original Message-----
From: John [mailto:isettajohn@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:08 PM
To: amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

--- In amphicar-lovers@y..., Ren? Pohl <amphicar@g...> wrote:
> Yes, in the 9 digit US number it is certainly the 6th digit giving
the year of manufacture. So it is a 1964 in this case.
> Anyway in the 6 digit number it is the 3rd digit telling the year of
> production.
> Important: Keep in mind that most cars were sold sometimes years
later after
> production and that NO car was built later than
1965.

******** I've been reading the posts on the side hoping to learn
something here but only wind up more confused than before. I own two
Amphi's and wonder about the year/vin thing. The first one is 101221
which is titled as a 63. According to the posts here I'll buy that it
was built in 61 if the third digit says so. However the second car I
have is a one owner, driven one season car and parked with 974
original miles. Its vin is 106522387 which the people here say is a
62 according to the 6th digit. This I dont believe - sorry. Am I
wrong? JW *****

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Schulz Gary-FGS111 · Nov 14, 2001

RE: Re: VIN vs YEAR

One more thing...I'm not sure if anyone was able to open the enclosure I had of
my chassis plate but if you carefully examine it and I did under a microscope,
The date stamped on it absolutely was stamped at the same time as the rest of
the information. Same die same strike depth. The VIN # 100927 But the stamped
date is 1963.

Gary Schulz

-----Original Message-----
From: Ren? Pohl [mailto:amphicar@gmx.de]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:58 PM
To: amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

That?s a good point!
Okay, if that is true, there should no car above VIN 10...3878 out there.
Because that is the number of produced cars. Hey, anybody out there can beat
the ...3878 at the VINs end?
Ren?

----- Original Message -----
From: Schulz Gary-FGS111 <fgs111@email.mot.com>
To: <amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:29 PM
Subject: RE: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

I think there is absolutely no credible evidence that says a VIN 101221 was
built in 1961. By that logic the Amphi corp could only limit their yearly
output to 1000 cars otherwise they would defeat their own numbering scheme.
I still say They just numbered then sequentially. Look at the
transmissions, They are sequential. Also I don't believe the bit about
VIN's being stamped at various times by dealers. I can say without
reservation that the numbers on mine were all stamped at the same time by
the same tool!

Gary Schulz

-----Original Message-----
From: John [mailto:isettajohn@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:08 PM
To: amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [amphicar-lovers] Re: VIN vs YEAR

--- In amphicar-lovers@y..., Ren? Pohl <amphicar@g...> wrote:
> Yes, in the 9 digit US number it is certainly the 6th digit giving
the year of manufacture. So it is a 1964 in this case.
> Anyway in the 6 digit number it is the 3rd digit telling the year of
> production.
> Important: Keep in mind that most cars were sold sometimes years
later after
> production and that NO car was built later than
1965.

******** I've been reading the posts on the side hoping to learn
something here but only wind up more confused than before. I own two
Amphi's and wonder about the year/vin thing. The first one is 101221
which is titled as a 63. According to the posts here I'll buy that it
was built in 61 if the third digit says so. However the second car I
have is a one owner, driven one season car and parked with 974
original miles. Its vin is 106522387 which the people here say is a
62 according to the 6th digit. This I dont believe - sorry. Am I
wrong? JW *****

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, just send an email TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
(this is not the same address for posting messages):
amphicar-lovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Any other issues may be addressed to the list owner/admin (Mike Israel)
amphicar770@yahoo.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Greg · Nov 15, 2001

Re: Re: VIN vs YEAR

Thaw? I'm in Michigan and still waiting for fall to
begin. It's unbelievable and welcome for my first year
with an Amphi. Today, mid-Novemeber is in the mid-60s
when we would normally be in the 30s-40s. The last 3
weekends have been the same and I've been on the water
at least one day of each of them. Each weekend I keep
thinking that this is the one where I need to do the
winterization and put it away, but then the weather
report says otherwise. I don't know how the rest of
the country is doing, but in Michigan this year, it's
fantastic and predications again for this coming
weekend are warm again. Maybe I won't have to put it
in storage at all this year. Last weekend, I met up
with Paul Rasmussen who moved back from Germany and we
had a great time with 2 cars on the lake for the day.
Hope the rest of you are enjoying good weather and
have a safe holiday.
Greg Zinkosky(balmy Michigan)

P.S. On the Vin/Year discussion, what does it mean
when no year is stamped? I heard from someone that it
meant the car was sold in '68 but could not be stamped
as such because of the EPA restrictions starting that
year. My VIN is 106522207 with no year stamped and
would be considered a late car, i.e. black dash, thru
hull shocks, etc.
--- markamsdill@aol.com wrote:
> Hello all, Mark from Dexter here. We have a blue 62
> # 100093. It must be one
> of the early ones, We have more fun with this car
> than any of our other cars
> . I should have bought one years ago.Everyone have a
> great holiday season and
> wish for an early thaw. Mark and Karen Amsdill
>

__________________________________________________

Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com

VIN vs YEAR

Allan Woodcock

Guest

John Friese

Guest

Ren? Pohl

Guest

John

Guest

John

Guest

Schulz Gary-FGS111

Guest

tommyintpa@aol.com

Guest

aheath@us.ibm.com

Guest

markamsdill@aol.com

Guest

tommyintpa@aol.com

Guest

Ren? Pohl

Guest

Ren? Pohl

Guest

tommyintpa@aol.com

Guest

Schulz Gary-FGS111

Guest

Schulz Gary-FGS111

Guest

Greg

Guest