R
rogtwo@aol.com
Guest
Rob,
While I have no experience, I think you are exactly right. A single door
seal (of the correct thickness) should be just as good as two seals.
As you obviously know, the two seals are NOT redundant. That is, the two
seals seal against each other and are not like piston rings (for example)
where one ring catches what leaks by the first. There's no reason to believe
that the seal on the door will seal better against a second seal than it will
against a smooth painted surface (again, assuming the door seal is thick
enough).
Secondly, I don't think the seal on the body is a safety improvement. That
is, the seal on the body is much thinner than the one on the door. If the
seal on the door were to get ripped off, the seal on the body would NOT fill
the gap. With or without the seal on the body, you would have a large leak.
But, since you bring up door seals, I will mention what I'm going to try.
Since the seals on my door are old and somewhat compressed, I don't think I
can get away without the seals on the body. Since my body seals are getting
a bit ragged, I decided to replace them. I considered the ones available
from the usual sources, but decided to be a cheep-skate (it's in my blood).
What I found is that Frost King makes what they call "X-Treme Rubber
WeatherSeal" - "Ribbed Profile". It comes on a 8 1/2 foot roll and is 3/4
inch wide and 1/8 inch thick. However, it is designed to be torn in half
lengthwise into two 3/8 inch wide strips, thus it will do both doors for
about $6. It is self-stick and appears to be made of a good quality
closed-cell foam rubber. The box claims, among other things, "Will not
harden, crack or freeze". I got the gray color (part number V23G) but it is
also available in white (V23W) and brown (V23B). I will report here in maybe
6 months on how it is working.
So, am I concerned about experimenting with such a seal? Not at all -- If
this seal should come off while I'm swimming, I don't expect any big
problems. Thanks to the other thicker seal on the door, the leak shouldn't
be too large -- not more than the bulge pump can handle. Also, since our
lakes here tend to be long and skinny, I won't ever be more than about 1 mile
from shore. This distance can be covered in about 10 minutes if the engine
is running, and 1 hour if I have to paddle the car to shore. Thus, I figure
to have a problem, I have to have all three of the following happen at the
same time:
1) The door seal failing without me noticing (it's very unlikely the seal
will slip out of place while I'm out on the water with the door is closed
tightly)
2) The engine quitting, preventing me from getting to shore quickly
3) The bulge pump failing, allowing the car to flood before I can paddle it
to shore.
If I should be this unlucky, well that's why I carry lifejackets, flares, and
insurance on the car.
This is just my reasoning, I understand that others see it differently.
Roger St. John
White '63
Seattle
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
While I have no experience, I think you are exactly right. A single door
seal (of the correct thickness) should be just as good as two seals.
As you obviously know, the two seals are NOT redundant. That is, the two
seals seal against each other and are not like piston rings (for example)
where one ring catches what leaks by the first. There's no reason to believe
that the seal on the door will seal better against a second seal than it will
against a smooth painted surface (again, assuming the door seal is thick
enough).
Secondly, I don't think the seal on the body is a safety improvement. That
is, the seal on the body is much thinner than the one on the door. If the
seal on the door were to get ripped off, the seal on the body would NOT fill
the gap. With or without the seal on the body, you would have a large leak.
But, since you bring up door seals, I will mention what I'm going to try.
Since the seals on my door are old and somewhat compressed, I don't think I
can get away without the seals on the body. Since my body seals are getting
a bit ragged, I decided to replace them. I considered the ones available
from the usual sources, but decided to be a cheep-skate (it's in my blood).
What I found is that Frost King makes what they call "X-Treme Rubber
WeatherSeal" - "Ribbed Profile". It comes on a 8 1/2 foot roll and is 3/4
inch wide and 1/8 inch thick. However, it is designed to be torn in half
lengthwise into two 3/8 inch wide strips, thus it will do both doors for
about $6. It is self-stick and appears to be made of a good quality
closed-cell foam rubber. The box claims, among other things, "Will not
harden, crack or freeze". I got the gray color (part number V23G) but it is
also available in white (V23W) and brown (V23B). I will report here in maybe
6 months on how it is working.
So, am I concerned about experimenting with such a seal? Not at all -- If
this seal should come off while I'm swimming, I don't expect any big
problems. Thanks to the other thicker seal on the door, the leak shouldn't
be too large -- not more than the bulge pump can handle. Also, since our
lakes here tend to be long and skinny, I won't ever be more than about 1 mile
from shore. This distance can be covered in about 10 minutes if the engine
is running, and 1 hour if I have to paddle the car to shore. Thus, I figure
to have a problem, I have to have all three of the following happen at the
same time:
1) The door seal failing without me noticing (it's very unlikely the seal
will slip out of place while I'm out on the water with the door is closed
tightly)
2) The engine quitting, preventing me from getting to shore quickly
3) The bulge pump failing, allowing the car to flood before I can paddle it
to shore.
If I should be this unlucky, well that's why I carry lifejackets, flares, and
insurance on the car.
This is just my reasoning, I understand that others see it differently.
Roger St. John
White '63
Seattle
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]