<table bgColor="#c8e0d8" background="">
<font size="2">Meh. Keep moving...Nothing to see
here. It's just more of the usual"faux journalism": sloppy filler pablum, rife with errors and omissions. Hell, one click and one sees they didn't even get the
<u>name</u> of the so-called "
1958 Zunndapp Janus"right (it's spelled "Z?ndapp" or "Zuendapp", with a single "n"), so what does that tell you about the reliability of the rest of that screed?</font>
<font size="2">The fact that thismalformed tripe made it past the dozing editors and fact checkers at
Time magazine, and not
TheLogtooth County Crier or
Ed Shnook's Wonder Blog, is really just a sad sad commentary on the state of our "Fourth Estate"...I mean, if
Timemanages to get this easy stuff so farked up, what faith can one have that the important things are gettinga proper treatment, Eh?</font>
<font size="2">Kisses,</font>
<font size="2"></font>
<font size="2">Bilgey (who gets his "news" from
Fark)</font><font size="2"></font>
<font size="2"></font>
<font size="2">----- Original Message -----
From: Douglas Klink
To:
amphicar-lovers@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 9:22 AM
Subject: [amphicar-lovers] 50 worst
Read the article. Thought he spot on with a few but some were cars I didn't
think were that bad for the era. The Amphi seems like that, if you hold it
up to modern standards, as he did with many of the cars, it may seem dated
or odd. But if you put yourself in the 60's, it was right in there with the
culture of the times, just like many of the cars he dissed!
</font>
